U.S. Constitution

First Amendment widely supported, although most don’t know what’s in it

FAC_SOFA_cover_FFI-195x300An annual survey of attitudes about the First Amendment found that a vast majority of Americans support the amendment and the freedoms it guarantees. But most Americans who responded to the survey were unaware of what the specific freedoms are. Clearly, we need to emphasize our history more in high school and college.

We are going to help you here in case you get asked about the First Amendment by a pollster. You can confidently tell the survey taker that there are five freedoms, and they are:

— Freedom of the press.

— Freedom of religion.

— Freedom of speech.

— The right of assembly.

— The right to petition government.

Here is how the First Amendment reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The First Amendment Center of the Freedom Forum Institute has been conducting the State of the First Amendment survey every year since 1997. You can read the full survey for 2018 by clicking here.

The First Amendment Center reports that 40% of the respondents couldn’t name a single freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment. About 36% could name only one freedom. Of the 1,009 people surveyed, only one correctly named all five freedoms in the First Amendment.

Here are some other findings: “This year’s survey revealed that Americans consider fake news more objectionable than hate speech on social media, though both are opposed by large majorities,” the FAC said in a news release. “The survey showed that 83% of respondents agreed that social media companies should remove false information, compared to 72% who agreed such companies should remove hate speech.”

The center said the “good news for First Amendment advocates is that, even with those high levels of concern and desire for action, a majority of Americans do not support the government in having the power to require social media companies to remove objectionable content.”

 

 

 


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Institute for Media and Public Trust secures major grant to propel Journalists of Color training program

By Jim Boren In a significant commitment toward fostering diversity and inclusion in San Joaquin Valley journalism, the Institute for Media and Public Trust at Fresno State has been awarded a $201,000 grant to continue its visionary Journalists of Color training program. The California Endowment grant will help fortify the ongoing success of its pioneering…

Collaborative Crusade: Journalists, funders unite at Stanford to rescue local journalism from decline

By Jim Boren The atmosphere was charged with optimism as about 200 news leaders and foundation executives convened a journalism conference at Stanford University. Their shared objective: Devise a comprehensive strategy to revitalize the precarious business model of news, especially traditional newspapers. Discussions at the California Journalism Summit revolved around cultivating sustainable support through avenues…

California plays catch-up: Two state Assembly bills require media literacy in K-12 public school curriculum.

By Lucca Lorenzi, guest author The National Center for Biotechnology Information defines social media literacy as having “knowledge and development of skills to analyze, evaluate, produce, and participate in social media, which favors critical thinking.” With millions of users on social media platforms across multiple generations, you’d expect that its common use would warrant school curriculum to…

Comments

Leave a comment